Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '22 at 03:57
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 192 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 363 47% 352 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 3537) 1GB CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.55% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 11.2 9% 12.6 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 11.7 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.55% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 178 208 210 222 228 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 458 Write 439 Mixed 294 SusWrite 232 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 38.4 128% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 332 260% 357 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 875GB free Firmware: JA0OA710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 94 96 96 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 88 Write 88.3 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 95.2 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%
Multi Flash Reader 1GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.4 5% 4.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	625x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	405x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	251x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	124x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	103x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	58x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	50x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16