TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 17:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 40.7
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 113
39% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 39.7%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.57 fps
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.05 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SHCB-2280 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 344 334 345 335 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 475
Write 405
Mixed 215
SusWrite 341
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 17.1
82% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 37.4
88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 75.1%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 13.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 29.4%
 Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples1,027x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples963x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples911x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples483x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples462x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples333x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples175x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples150x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples356x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback