Dream Machines Gaming Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDream Machines Gaming Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 22:52
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 76
2-Core 121
61% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 181
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 81
60% 74.1 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 59.3
66% 84.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 105%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1116) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 5.3
3% 20.7 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Patriot P300 1TB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 475 312 268 259 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,112
Write 1,088
Mixed 817
SusWrite 378
190% 849 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 20.2
128% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 285
235% 343 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 234%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
3GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.8 2.1 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Read 6
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.1
5% 4.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR3200S464L22/16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Machines Gaming Laptop Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Dream Machines Gaming Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback