Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory27.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 83
2-Core 148
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 479
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 34.7
28% 34.4 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 25
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 89 80 93 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 92.9
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 82.8
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
452GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 108 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 108
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 118
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 107%
WD Re 2TB-$30
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 146 145 145 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 145
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID... 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback