Acer Swift SF314-510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-510G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Brahma_TL
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime20.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 111
44% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 359
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1482) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 10
7% 16.2 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
2% 3.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 298 313 323 302 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 654
Write 501
Mixed 728
SusWrite 317
124% 550 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 19
111% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 363
270% 358 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 32.2
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-510G Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback