Insys WHA-14P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInsys WHA-14P2  (all builds)
MotherboardINSYS WHA-14P2
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 23:10
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Memory 27.1
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 35.1
17% 26.7 Pts
4-Core 65.9
8-Core 62.7
9% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 66.5
4% 66.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix F14 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 75 87 87 93 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 326
Write 278
Mixed 223
SusWrite 89.7
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 11.4
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 33.2
47% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LS38G6K53FP-1611CL 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.6
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WHA-14P2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Insys WHA-14P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback