Insys WHA-14P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInsys WHA-14P2  (all builds)
MotherboardINSYS WHA-14P2
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Memory 1.33
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 88.6
21% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 119
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 4.8
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix F14 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 42 54 64 12 86 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 237
Write 71.6
Mixed 122
SusWrite 57
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 0.5
18% 6.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.9
DQ Write 83.4
DQ Mixed 33
40% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 59%
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
57GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 101 142 62 58 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 168
Write 175
Mixed 160
SusWrite 100
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 8.5
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 65.5
59% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LS38G6K53FP-1611CL 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.99% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 493
8% 493 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WHA-14P2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Insys WHA-14P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback