Today's hottest deals

HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 855E
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190620
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 113
42% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 855E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 101 110 122 128 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 390
Write 230
Mixed 281
SusWrite 127
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 40.4
122% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 112
113% 183 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback