Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 11:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 122
57% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 181
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 33.1
26% 33.4 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.6
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 117 87 81 105 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 50.7
Write 137
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 101
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 99U5471-011.A01LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback