Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 06:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 463
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 112
Parallax 95.8
91% 106 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.7
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 429GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 500
Write 490
Mixed 492
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 17.8
78% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 13.9
16% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
63GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 501
Write 345
Mixed 357
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 18.2
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 86.2
96% 162 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback