Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20022

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20022  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO NITU1
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 03:13
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 63.4
37% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 62.9
8-Core 60.4
8% 61.7 Pts
64-Core 62.2
4% 62.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210M
Legend(17AA 389F) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8898
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 41 38 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 50.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 40.8
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
94GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 21
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 20.3
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20022 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20022

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback