Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 06:40
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 704
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W600
AMD(1002 2B1E) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 11.4
6% 10.6 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$79
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 123 130 138 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 126
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3531382E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393955353437312D3033392E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393930353430332D3531382E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393955353437312D3033392E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393930353430332D3531382E4130304C46 0x9801 0x3939553534373... 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback