Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 120
60% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 272
29% 231 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 22
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 20 17 28 52 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 46.1
Write 70
Mixed 21
SusWrite 33
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 54%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
0GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.3
Write 59.1
Mixed 46.1
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 35%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
232GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 61 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 60.7
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 60.7
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 19 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 13.7
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 18.9
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
General UDisk 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 3.5 7.2 5.5 6.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 6.2
7% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 10%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.6
Write 16.8
Mixed 21.2
27% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
90% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback