Biostar TA870+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar TA870+  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101011
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 01 '14 at 07:18
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 129
44% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 258
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.200.1004.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 29
Parallax 32.1
21% 29 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 34.3
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phinocom SSD 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM05.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50% Average
Read 184
Write 358
Mixed 177
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 8.04
65% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 8.32
18% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
186GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 70.1
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.32
104% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB
5GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Read 18
Write 3.7
Mixed 6.55
10% 9.42 MB/s
4K Read 2.55
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 1.23
70% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 13%
Typical TA870+ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA870+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback