bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory83.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 83.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory50.4 GB free of 83.248 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
None, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 87
2-Core 145
53% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 332
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 216 217 219 220 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
211GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 276 279 273 276 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 83%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 21GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 572
Write 231
Mixed 360
291% 387 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4.3
880% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 71%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2.5TB
432GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 276 278 273 276 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
294GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 277 279 273 276 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 83GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767, 15744, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 36.8
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 11
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback