MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 19:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 112
48% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 174
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 105
Parallax 66.3
57% 80.5 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 65.1
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foxline F56X5SE 256GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 61 86 68 72 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 331
Write 85
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 77.3
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 19.2
47% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 96.4
84% 129 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.6% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback