Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 57.9
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 110
38% 65 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 379
48% 367 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 17
10% 15.3 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 11.6
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OOS500G 500GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 51 47 44 44 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 45.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 46.2
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
72GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 92 107 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 88
Write 109
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 105
59% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback