Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX706HCB
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 4.36 1-Core 70 2-Core 185 38% 86.5 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 534 45% 389 Pts	64-Core 786 49% 786 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 144C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 3.2 2% 26.6 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB 2,402 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 546 547 581 464 559 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 595 Write 489 Mixed 465 SusWrite 521 116% 518 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 39 139% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 296 199% 238 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 209%
Nvme PM981 Samsung 1024GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 283% 608GB free Firmware: EXA74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 449 651 751 559 724 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 884 Write 745 Mixed 648 SusWrite 601 161% 720 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 35.8 118% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 239 163% 201 MB/s
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 356%
Generic External 1TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 849GB free, PID 3960 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 51 34 47 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 113 Write 35.4 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 41.8 66% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.7 202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB 6,335 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.3 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 4.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 460 9% 460 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	14x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	7x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 60,311 samples	7x

SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	8x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBBench 217%, 9,047 samples	2x
PM981 Samsung 1024GBNvmeBench 283%, 25 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 31%, 42,476 samples	6x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	3x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Adata 16GBSamsungBench 69%, 317 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400