Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HCB
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 4.36
1-Core 70
2-Core 185
38% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 534
45% 389 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 144C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 3.2
2% 26.6 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 546 547 581 464 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 595
Write 489
Mixed 465
SusWrite 521
116% 518 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 39
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 296
199% 238 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 209%
Nvme PM981 Samsung 1024GB
608GB free
Firmware: EXA74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 449 651 751 559 724 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 884
Write 745
Mixed 648
SusWrite 601
161% 720 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 35.8
118% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 239
163% 201 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 356%
Generic External 1TB
849GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 51 34 47 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 113
Write 35.4
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 41.8
66% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 4.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 460
9% 460 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback