Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 12:26
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 138
56% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 208
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 11.5
4% 7.03 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 67 32 36 36 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 466
Write 364
Mixed 16
SusWrite 83.2
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 1
56% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 41.1
38% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 105%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 155 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 153
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback