ECS H110M4-C2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H110M4-C2H  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161212
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 13:20
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 566
50% 424 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 0.3
5% 4.93 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 72 2.6 48 62 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 450
Write 337
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 75.1
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 100%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
77GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 58 66 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 88.4
Write 87.8
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 60.8
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5723-006.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M4-C2H Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback