Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 93.2 1-Core 58.9 2-Core 89.3 54% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 190 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 4.9 4% 5.43 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.5 3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63 7,628 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 427GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 65 50 59 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 67.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 59 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 80CE M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 11 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	19x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 27%, 948 samples	5x
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 2,036 samples	2x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 51%, 1,341 samples	2x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $395