Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170301
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 03:21
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 676
65% 535 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2114 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 71.7
61% 74.9 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 70.3
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 458 207 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 471
Write 474
Mixed 400
SusWrite 258
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 34.9
120% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 308
225% 289 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
60GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.5 43 40 46 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 7.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 32.5
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROU 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback