Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3401QC_M3401QC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3401QC_M3401QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3401QC
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 20:16
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 115
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 382
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1B32) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.64.07
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 31.3
19% 39.5 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 20.6
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 453 421 412 428 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,100
SusWrite 464
247% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.7
199% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 847
569% 694 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 176%
Great: 237%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 112 106 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65% Good
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 109
128% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.5
308% 3.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 0.5
393% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 25
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3401QC_M3401QC Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3401QC_M3401QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback