HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 00:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 181
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 473
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.9
6% 10.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 12.1
9% 11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 163 174 310 537 582 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 789
Write 619
Mixed 571
SusWrite 355
130% 584 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 19.4
83% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 322
210% 248 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 28.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-ef2xxx Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 15%
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback