HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 61%
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 53%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 242
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 675
70% 561 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 87AF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 72.6
62% 77.9 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 67.4
62% 77.2 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 740 865 858 847 859 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 894
Mixed 855
SusWrite 822
223% 998 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.9
233% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 342
316% 473 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 203%
Great: 203%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
427GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 432 453 456 448 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 455
Mixed 425
SusWrite 443
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 43.8
141% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 317
238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 25.1
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 73%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback