| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130128 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '22 at 19:17 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.8%
Average
|
47% 75.5 Pts
|
25% 196 Pts
|
12% 200 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.1%
Average
|
43% 52.1 fps
|
37% 45.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 41 81 75 92 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
25% 34.4 MB/s
|
61% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
45.4%
Average
|
45% 15.9 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
29% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,396 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 342x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 277x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $92Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 196x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 455x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 150x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 113x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $234 |