Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 09:06
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 873
76% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,431
88% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$450
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 165
Parallax 155
122% 157 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 165
Splatting 129
117% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 273 283 287 280 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48% Average
Read 298
Write 274
Mixed 275
SusWrite 281
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 13.3
59% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 15.9
16% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 93%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
929GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 205 207 207 205 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 359
Write 324
Mixed 321
SusWrite 206
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 36.5
121% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 276
207% 276 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 77%
Great: 133%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
894GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 200 201 201 199 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 360
Write 313
Mixed 311
SusWrite 201
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 23.4
91% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 48.1
81% 153 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 91%
ASMT ASM236X NVME 1TB
1GB free, PID 2364
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 302
Write 283
Mixed 280
368% 288 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 14.6
1,794% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 45.8
DQ Mixed 17.1
2,224% 28.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 35.5
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 106%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback