Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8599
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211228
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 255
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 763
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8599) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.3
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 250 255 251 244 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 668
Write 229
Mixed 330
SusWrite 288
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 34.7
160% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 204
198% 319 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
839GB free
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 121 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 122
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29.3
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G6 MT Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback