Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime29.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 218
66% 126 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 351
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 277
Mixed 320
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 13.5
73% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 275
222% 314 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
USB 256GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.9% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 34.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 36.6
8% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 8
27% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 11.4
10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 7.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback