Asus G20AJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G20AJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20AJ
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 05:53
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 580
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 85E9) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 38.2
26% 33.7 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 33.9
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 495
Write 396
Mixed 411
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 18.6
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 16.1
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
234GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 98.7
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.65
198% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 112%
SAMSUNG MMCRE28G8MXP-0VB 128GB
78GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
Read 211
Write 42.6
Mixed 139
144% 131 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 9.51
4K Mixed 5.79
570% 9.54 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 8.33
DQ Mixed 4.98
502% 8.91 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GRSL Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20AJ Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20AJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback