Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.67% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCASPER CASPER NIRVANA
MotherboardCasper NIRVANA  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 12:56
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$253
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 148
55% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 408
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 49
Parallax 19.3
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 37.3
35% 44.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 104 22 91 52 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.67% Terrible
Read 160
Write 91.2
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 51.4
20% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback