MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 05:53
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 90.1 42% 68.2 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 212 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.8% Average	Lighting 54.8 Reflection 55.5 Parallax 83.8 45% 64.7 fps	MRender 56.3 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 41.3 42% 53 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 25 37 54 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 296 Write 242 Mixed 226 SusWrite 79.1 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 1 19% 6.33 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 93.9 DQ Mixed 0.1 35% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 98%
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1011 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 35GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 96 113 113 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 304 Write 137 Mixed 190 SusWrite 115 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 13 61% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 231 180% 248 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 2x8GB 785 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 21.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	44x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	23x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	8x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16