MSI MS-17Q1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77 12UHS
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q1  (all builds)
Memory40.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 18:59
Run Duration433 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 202
2-Core 398
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 747
8-Core 1444
130% 1,096 Pts
64-Core 2,597
161% 2,597 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4800 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 244
Parallax 336
222% 284 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 238
Splatting 171
180% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 186%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BTW 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2937 3009 3066 3374 3024 1524 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 2,765
Write 3,058
Mixed 2,650
SusWrite 2,822
638% 2,824 MB/s
4K Read 74
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 108
363% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,929
DQ Write 1,629
DQ Mixed 1760
1,324% 1,773 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 475%
Great: 498%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3251 3288 3548 2143 781 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 1,567
Write 3,073
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 2,246
500% 2,199 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 106
373% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,146
DQ Write 1,773
DQ Mixed 1,821
1,401% 1,913 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 402%
Great: 442%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: RKT302.b Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2527 640 267 2 2.1 2 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,620
Write 2,202
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 573
331% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 53.5
223% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,635
DQ Mixed 1116
972% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 238%
Great: 303%
Micron_5 210_MTFDDAK3 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 320 314 318 310 289 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Read 252
Write 174
Mixed 148
SusWrite 311
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 17.5
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 64.7
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 59.3
44% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%
SHGP31-2000GM 2TB
284GB free
Firmware: 31060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 1194 1301 960 756 756 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,568
Write 2,410
Mixed 1590
SusWrite 1,116
430% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 87.5
302% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,973
DQ Write 1,742
DQ Mixed 1,694
1,315% 1803 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 347%
Great: 446%
WD My Passport 2665 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2665
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 82 65 77 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 76.1
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 74
97% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 51
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 30
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 136%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17Q1 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback