Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 12:27
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 805
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 59
52% 62 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 57.9
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR313 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1634 1655 1452 426 437 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 748
Write 1,881
Mixed 928
SusWrite 1,006
260% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 47.8
155% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 671
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 357
292% 429 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 160%
Great: 332%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
122GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.9% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 34.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 40.5
8% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 8.5
31% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 15
12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 149 148 151 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 168
Mixed 102
SusWrite 149
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 136 135 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 94.1
Write 93.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 136
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 87%
WDC WD75 00AACS-00ZJB0 750GB
559GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 32 33 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.5% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.4
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 32.3
43% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 30%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
57GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.8
Write 34
Mixed 27.6
41% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 64%
ST950042 0AS 500GB
431GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2 2 2 2.1 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 35.8
Write 31.9
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 2
30% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 29%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
27GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1.8 0.3 2 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 9
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 2.1
9% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.5 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Read 13
Write 10.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 5
11% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 21%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.8 3 3.3 0.1 0.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 1.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 1.3
5% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback