Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 15:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 134
57% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 200
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
MSI(1462 1613) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
1% 1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 38 72 91 85 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45% Average
Read 82.4
Write 94.9
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 74.1
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 802C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 13.6
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback