bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77EB
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130516
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 21:28
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 404
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 66.8
55% 66.8 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 54.4
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 58 221 125 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 409
Write 350
Mixed 352
SusWrite 72.6
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 6.7
42% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 19.5
24% 46 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 86 85 75 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 69.5
Write 64.4
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 74.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 62%
USB3.0 high speed 1TB
63GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 216 220 191 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 206
Mixed 202
SusWrite 134
255% 192 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 11.1
1,068% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 16.6
1,889% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M1 0009DA1C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback