Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 124
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 227
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 39
Parallax 47.4
29% 40.7 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 27
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyperx Fury 3D 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 47 43 4.3 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 338
Write 287
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 88.4
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
5% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Xtreem-LV-2666 Xtreem-LV-2666 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 14.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback