Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 640 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 640 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 137
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 245
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 102 27 28 14 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 478
Write 397
Mixed 321
SusWrite 72
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 49.2
DQ Write 1.7
DQ Mixed 0.2
6% 17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 70%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 159GB
103GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 97.8
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 106
62% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 92
Write 13.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 13
35% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.6
118% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Ramaxel RMT3170EF68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G1 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback