Today's hottest deals

Asus X540LJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X540LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540LJ
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 123
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 164
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Asus(1043 105E) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.9
4% 7.8 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: J00fae20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 369 371 412 421 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 414
Write 457
Mixed 381
SusWrite 395
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 30.8
116% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.9
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 155
128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
630GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 61 86 88 90 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 19.8
Write 77.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 76.8
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1L16BC8R2-BUIS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540LJ Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback