Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81N3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81N3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 47.3
40% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 37.7
7% 47.3 Pts
64-Core 51.5
3% 51.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.4
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPZX-08Z10 500GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 90 53 90 96 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 10.5
Write 10.4
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 81.7
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81N3 Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81N3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback