Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 31
2-Core 64.2
33% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 65.3
8-Core 73.2
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 70.8
4% 70.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.08
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.2
0% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 5
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 99 97 96 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 99.9
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
215% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 5.7
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback