PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190515 |
Uptime | 3.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '22 at 19:23 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8750) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 260 266 269 274 274 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
443GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 416 419 429 442 443 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
531GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 129 134 95 104 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,274x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 542x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 512x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 312x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $282Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 296x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $234Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 254x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 138% - Outstanding | Total price: $338 |