bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory15.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory7.3 GB free of 15.707 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime33.8 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 5217
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 154
57% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 558
53% 438 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 537GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 15 14 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 14.6
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.1
361% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 15GB
null MHz
3968, 12116 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback