Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1400 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 00:19
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 126
55% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 286
28% 231 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 874F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 102
Parallax 71.6
60% 82.7 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 58.5
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
11GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 377
Mixed 322
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 259
189% 247 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 139 143 124 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 157
Write 146
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 131
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 R5 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback