Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 16:37
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 283
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1934
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.4
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 256GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210928a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 201 148 256 213 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 311
Write 221
Mixed 163
SusWrite 200
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 27.9
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 143
105% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
320GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 286 352 334 306 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 215
Write 348
Mixed 307
SusWrite 316
68% 297 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 33.8
122% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 136
131% 212 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WJD8G8M08N2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 11.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback