Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemApple iMac12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B5BF58194151B
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 151
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Apple(106B 6741) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.2
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 1.9 31 8.7 39 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 395
Write 330
Mixed 306
SusWrite 66.3
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 11.1
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 34.8
41% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 55%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 5786
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 12.3
16% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,1 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback