MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory119.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 19:46
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 731
68% 568 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 294
Parallax 323
238% 303 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 256
Splatting 192
208% 264 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 209 202 207 138 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 346
Mixed 403
SusWrite 186
101% 458 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.4
142% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 358
330% 509 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 117%
Great: 144%
Samsung MZ7KM480HAHP-00005 480GB
287GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 372 372 371 374 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 448
Mixed 412
SusWrite 373
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7KM480HAHP-00005 480GB
45GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 373 375 373 374 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 445
Mixed 415
SusWrite 374
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 41.4
146% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Kingston SEDC1000H400G 400GB
867GB free
Firmware: E7FTD4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3118 3253 3317 2733 2751 3297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 1,425
Write 3,262
Mixed 547
SusWrite 3,078
473% 2,078 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 40.9
145% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 808
604% 808 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 325%
Great: 325%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
181GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 378 380 377 381 380 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 455
Mixed 384
SusWrite 379
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 49
163% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 347
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST12000NM0117-2GY101 12TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: CM03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST12000NM0117-2GY101 12TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: CM03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 41.4
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 110%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback