Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 183
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 284
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630
Gigabyte(1458 40B4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 30.3
29% 32.3 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 31
Splatting 30.7
26% 31.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN010754
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 411 406 416 403 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 448
Mixed 446
SusWrite 340
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 147
128% 182 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 148 147 147 147 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 146
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4041BBA1D0MA1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 23.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback