MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 07:37
Run Duration556 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 316
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 926
94% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1121 239 232 257 314 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,452
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 398
302% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 68.2
253% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,239
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 1,027
760% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 205%
Great: 300%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
880GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 369 385 357 355 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 304
Write 380
Mixed 300
SusWrite 370
77% 339 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.7
164% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 233
209% 317 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 100%
Great: 117%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
907GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 85 96 102 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 103
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 87.7
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 8.5 8.4 11 16 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 48.2
Write 11.9
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 12.8
35% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
144% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 39%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
887GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 101 100 109 140 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 153
Write 164
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 113
171% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 67%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68JCSN0 1TB
472GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 113 113 113 108 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 109
121% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 115 114 109 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 119
SusWrite 111
180% 137 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.8
363% 5.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1
384% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 38.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback