Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '22 at 04:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 705
63% 531 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 30.8
26% 31.5 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 22.2
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 405 413 414 421 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 482
Write 386
Mixed 392
SusWrite 411
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 25.5
102% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 124
129% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Initio 3639S 1TB
851GB free
Firmware: 0057
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 85 90 89 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 165
Write 24.9
Mixed 62
SusWrite 87.4
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback